Versatile slugger Pearce is a valuable trade chip

.564 slugging percentage against lefties since 2014 is among game's best

July 27th, 2016

At 39-61 after a 3-1 win over the Dodgers on Wednesday, the Rays could do everything at the Aug. 1 non-waiver Trade Deadline, or nearly nothing. They could move , , , or even and explode the industry. Or with only three impending free agents, two of whom are unlikely trade targets, they could simply sit tight and hope for better luck with the same core in 2017.
The one thing we know for nearly certain: is going somewhere, since his one-year contract is nearly up. And since he's a fit for just about every single contender in baseball, the Rays might actually get a nice return for the relatively small $4.75 million they gave Pearce in January.
After all, Pearce is hitting a very impressive .312/.384/.528, which is 46 percentage points above average and nearly identical to 's .283/.376/.544, although in many fewer plate appearances. Or if you look at the past three seasons, he's hit .271/.347/.502 in 931 plate appearances, basically the same as 's .273/.356/.492 in 855 times up. Pearce is no shortstop, of course, but he's played first and second this year, and he made 71 starts in the outfield for Baltimore in 2014-15. In the age of long bullpens and short benches, versatility is key.
Plus, Pearce is a lefty-masher. His career on-base percentage against lefties is .357, and his slugging against southpaws is .505, which comes out to 33 percentage points above average. As we said, every contending team could find a spot on its bench for a hitter like that. These four, however, are the best possible fits.
 Mets
With lefties at first (), left () and right () entering the season, the Mets seemed like a perfect spot for Pearce last offseason, and they still do now. That hasn't much changed now that has taken over first base, since he's another lefty who can't hit lefties, and at second base, hasn't hit a lick (.210/.297/.322) since the end of April.
Remember, for all the talk about injuries in the rotation, the Mets are far more in need of offense, as they're 28th in runs per game -- and they're tied for 20th in production against lefties. Pearce could take the spot of the increasingly extraneous and join with righty and lefty to make for a pretty useful multipositional bench trio. If the Mets aren't making a big splash, they need to upgrade around the edges.
 Indians
Speaking of contenders who could use help against lefties, we have Cleveland, as its .384 slugging against southpaws is better than only five other teams. With and capably handling first base and designated hitter, perhaps the fit here doesn't seem obvious. But then you realize that it sounds less and less likely that the team can rely on at all this year, and that 37-year-old (.209/.262/.336) has been one of the least effective hitters in baseball, and you see that moves need to be made.
So it would take some minor shuffling, but it'd be worth it overall. Pearce would take time in left field, pushing Jose Ramirez to third, and Uribe to the bench. The Indians have arguably baseball's best rotation, after all, and they've received an extremely unexpected performance from . They can't let all that go to waste without some help.
Gif: Steve Pearce diving catch
 Red Sox
Why would baseball's highest-scoring team be in the market for another bat? Because they may have one of baseball's weakest benches, which is why we've seen them make minor deals for infielders and in recent weeks. That pair, along with rookie and backup catcher , makes up Boston's current bench, and they've all combined to hit just .257/.317/.365 this year.
With and still likely weeks away, Pearce could immediately take some of the pressure off of in left field, pushing him back into the utility role he's better suited for. (Pearce could also offer valuable insurance for at first, either himself or by pushing Holt to third and across the diamond.) By the time both Young and Swihart are healthy, it'd be near enough to expanded September rosters that finding room for everyone wouldn't be a problem, and it could actually lead to a good October bench.
Or, maybe, the thought of seeing Pearce's pull tendencies put to use in Fenway is too tempting to resist: 

 Nationals
In the midst of repeated bullpen issues, you can bet Washington's focus will be on relievers. That said, there's an obvious fit for Pearce here, too. First baseman hasn't hit much (.218/.280/.394) and has dealt with his usual health concerns, making him risky to rely upon. While the Nationals have dealt with that by putting rookie at second and pushing baseball demi-god to first, a lefty/lefty set of first basemen in Murphy and isn't ideal.
Besides, it's not as though 37-year-old (hitting .234/.321/.403 since the start of last year) should be considered irreplaceable at this point, anyway. Pearce would offer valuable insurance at first and support in left, likely displacing rookie (who himself replaced the injured ) on the Nats' bench. Remember the role once filled? That, but with better defense.