Inbox: What is offseason strategy for Rockies?

Beat reporter Thomas Harding answers questions from fans

October 25th, 2017

DENVER -- The going theme of questions in this Rockies Inbox: Are there tweaks that could make a young team that performed above expectations just a little better?
Read on to see what's on fans' minds.

Looking at the full season, -- who made the season-opening rotation at 22, after just 34 2/3 innings in Double-A in 2016 -- saw some improvement as a reliever. He had a 5.03 ERA as a starter to 3.04 in relief. His WHIP decreased from 1.38 to 0.88. He saw increases in his strikeouts per nine innings (6.4 to 8.7) and strikeout-to-walk rate (2.03 to 2.88).
Those stats, and the rise in velocity of his power fastball out of the bullpen, make the temptation to keep him in relief understandable.
:: Submit a question to the Rockies Inbox ::
However, the first 12 starts (8-2, 3.56 ERA, 62 percent strikes) suggest that he can start in the Majors. Now, go back to the age and the scant experience the previous year. Those led to some downturns in his effectiveness last season, but with experience there is reason to believe he will be a better starter. Coming out of the bullpen taught him the importance of attacking the strike zone immediately, which can be transferred to starting.
Last year showed that he needed experience to be effective as a starter through an entire season. It did not show that he can't start.
Besides, early indications are re-signing 2017 closer Greg Holland will be a priority.

In 2008, after Aaron Cook, , and Jeff Francis, the Rockies had veteran starters whose effectiveness had diminished. They couldn't absorb Francis' shoulder issues, which led to a 4-10, 5.01 performance in 24 starts and ultimately cost him the 2009 season.
These Rockies potentially have seven starters who were part of a postseason team -- , , , , , and Senzatela -- and some talented prospects that could force their way into action. The '08 team didn't have that level of talent.

On the flip side, the youth of this staff certainly is reason to wonder about regression. It'll depend on how they keep up with opponents who have a year's information on them.

The first question is whether the Rockies will extend the qualifying offer, valued at $18.1 million for 2018, to , who would have 10 days to accept or reject. Should he reject it, the Rockies could still negotiate with Gonzalez. But should he sign with another team, the Rockies should receive a pick in the '18 Draft.
If Gonzalez accepts, then nothing has changed. Highly regarded prospect , who missed the year with a rib injury, plus and will still be trying to make their marks in an outfield that includes center field stalwart Charlie Blackmon, and the versatile . It seems crowded, but remember that in 2017 Desmond, Parra and Dahl all missed significant time with injuries.
The Rockies will have to determine if re-signing Gonzalez hampers other efforts, such as re-signing Holland or possibly going after free-agent first baseman . It'll be part of an offseason strategy under which general manager Jeff Bridich will at least explore multiple trade options.

Doubtful. It's more likely the Rockies will continue their system of developing young power pitchers, and not go the veteran route until next season's non-waiver Trade Deadline. It's risky, as the Mets learned after making the 2015 World Series and seeing injuries and other struggles beset a young staff. But I don't see the Rockies in play for a top free agent such as or , and they have seen success developing from within.

I go back to a point I made earlier. A Rockies team that had struggled late in games for several seasons played with a greater confidence because of Holland's presence. Without the strong start, the Rockies' struggles in August and September would have doomed their postseason chances.

is a free agent, so the structure of the roster will determine if the team will re-sign him. However, if the Rockies re-sign him, it would likely to be as a backup who could start if necessary -- same as in 2017.