Ranking comeback chances of the four teams that lost Game 1

Breaking down the prospects for the Red Sox, Astros, Cubs and Phillies after Tuesday's games

13 minutes ago

Five seasons into the best-of-three Wild Card Series format (2020 and 2022–25), the data sends a clear warning: Don’t lose Game 1!

In 24 previous WCS matchups, only three teams rallied to win the series after dropping the opener. Two occurred during the unusual fan-free 2020 playoffs, leaving last year’s Yankees comeback over the Red Sox as the sole exception under normal conditions. 

Four teams tempted fate on Tuesday. Here is how their comeback odds stack up on our WCS (in this case, Worst-Case Scenario) scale from 1 (easy recovery) to 10 (ruh-roh).

1) Red Sox

Game 1 result: Boston was silenced by , held to just three hits total and blown out late in a 9-0 loss.

Why they’re in trouble: The Game 1 loss was the continuation of a late-season skid for the Red Sox. Boston’s 71 runs scored in September were 18 fewer than any other team.

This lineup was carved up by Yankees Game 2 starter this year (.473 OPS against). And it’s banged up. and only recently returned from late-season injuries. is out with a right biceps issue. And  left Game 1 after aggravating the right hand issue that kept him out most of the season.

Why they can rally: We’re talking about the same team that was 32-46 about three months ago, so they know something about rallying. Actually, in three of the five previous postseason series between these two rivals, the Game 1 loser went on to win the series (Yankees in 2003 ALCS and 2025 WCS, Red Sox in 2004 ALCS).

More directly, it’s (150 ERA+ this season) in Game 2 and (127) in the possible Game 3. There’s still reason to believe if they can get a lead, their high-leverage bullpen corps, now featuring 100% more , can nail it down.

WCS rating: 6.33, or how many innings Schlittler dominated Boston in Game 1

2) Astros

Game 1 result: Trailing 5-0 through the top of the fifth in a bullpen game for both teams, the Astros’ late rally came up short in a 6-3 loss. 

Why they’re in trouble: As the first full-season postseason team without a winning record, the Astros already faced skepticism. Game 1 only amplified those concerns.

An Astros pitching staff stretched thin by the late-season race in the AL West was unable to corral the Sox. Furthermore, Chicago continued to execute a solid pitching plan against Houston centerpiece , who is now 5-for-24 with only one extra-base hit against Sox pitching this season. 

Why they can rally: While Chicago’s Game 2 starter was terrific this year, Houston’s Game 2 starter (2.47 ERA in his last eight starts) is probably the closest thing this series has to an established ace.

And while the Astros weren’t able to get to Chicago’s top reliever, , the Sox used him for 54 pitches over 2 1/3 innings, likely sidelining him for Game 2. Forcing Game 3 at Daikin Park would put heavy pressure on a young Sox squad that wobbled late in the regular season.

WCS rating: 7, or how many at-bats the Astros went without a hit with runners in scoring position in Game 1

3) Cubs

Game 1 result: The first pitch thrown by was hit 405 feet by Things really didn’t get any better from there in a 8-0 loss.

Why they’re in trouble: The Cubs lost their ability to host this series by going 11-13 in the final month, while the Padres went 18-6. Game 1 was a clear continuation of those trajectories.

Pitching is problematic for this Cubs team. Only the A’s (247) allowed more homers than the Cubs (231) this year. The long ball killed them in Game 1. And you don’t want to fall behind against a Padres team with the best bullpen of this postseason field.   

Why they can rally: San Diego’s Game 2 starter , who missed much of this season with an injury, is a much more favorable matchup for the Cubs than was. Pivetta’s fly-ball tendencies and opponent barrel rates play to the strengths of a Cubs offense that led the NL in home runs (220).

If the Cubs can force a Game 3, they could see , against whom they posted a .968 OPS in two games this year. The Padres’ other starting option would be , who was solid in his lone start against the Cubs but has had some struggles since a midseason trade to San Diego. In other words, there could be opportunities for the Cubs’ high-octane offense to do its thing.

WCS rating: 8, or how many outs King was from no-hitting the Cubs in Game 1

4) Phillies

Game 1 result: Lost 5-3 to the Braves, blowing a 3-2 eighth-inning lead when hit a three-run homer off .

Why they’re in trouble: Blowing a lead after outlasting is a massive emotional drain for a Phillies team that came into the postseason already leaking oil.

Forced into early (seventh-inning) duty due to a thin bullpen bridge, Duran (1.82 ERA in 2026, 8 2/3 scoreless career postseason innings coming in) threw 27 pitches in the loss, leaving his Game 2 availability up in the air and deepening the Phillies’ major bullpen concerns.

Why they can rally: A suboptimal Game 1 pitching setup was the collateral damage of the Phillies’ no good, terrible, very bad final week of the season, which had forced them to use in the regular-season finale. But now they have a legit stopper on the mound in Game 2 in the form of , who can take pressure off the ‘pen.

The Phillies will face in Game 2 and potentially in Game 3. Neither has postseason experience, and Philly’s offense showed needed signs of life against Sale.

WCS rating: 9.64, or the Phillies’ relief ERA in their last three games overall

Anthony Castrovince is a senior writer for MLB.com. Read his columns and follow him on X at @Castrovince.